Kerz v. Galena Water Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill in chancery. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jo Daviess County; the Hon. Oscar E. Heard, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson
It is first insisted that there was error in refusing to dissolve the temporary injunction and dismiss the bill for the reason the injunction was issued without notice and without-bond. E"o appeal was taken from the order overruling the motion to dissolve the injunction. An appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction must- be taken within" thirty days and perfected within sixty days from the entry of the order. Hurd’s Statutes, 1905, page 234, section 52. The bill was sworn to and set forth a good cause for issuing the temporary injunction without notice. If notice of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Stuart v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Wagner v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Griffin v. Goldsboro Water Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- People ex rel. Jackson v. Suburban RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hicks v. SageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- O'Beirne v. City of ElginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
- Pharis v. Moline Plow Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910