Legal Opinion

Friar, Nathan v. Wiersma, Lance

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 12, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00725Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NATHAN J. FRIAR, Petitioner, OPINION and ORDER v. 21-cv-725-jdp LANCE WIERSMA, Respondent. Petitioner Nathan J. Friar, who’s represented by Cole Daniel Ruby, seeks relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

following his conviction for second-degree sexual assault with the use of force in Dane County Case No. 2016CF1268. Friar raises three claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel under Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668

(1984), which respondent contends are meritless. I will deny the petition because I agree that Friar’s…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API