Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Arlene Knitwear, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 7, 1978No. 75 C 1434PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
The Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) brought this action to obtain relief for an elderly employee of defendants whose employment had been terminated in alleged violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34. After trying the matter without a jury, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P.
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 1, 1973, Bertie Feitis, a 62-year-old clothing designer, was discharged by defendant Arlene Knitwear, Inc. (“Arlene”) after…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Radio & Television Broadcast Technicians Local Union 1264 v. Broadcast Service of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Angeline OSTAPOWICZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNSON BRONZE COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Trevino v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Lynn Armbruster v. Terry QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 920, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,417 Miriam E. Geller, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Markham, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.