DeAngelis v. Bartoletti
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Heather Rae DeAngelis, No. CV-25-02753-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Anthony Bartoletti, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On August 4, 2025, pro se Plaintiff filed a complaint (Doc. 1), a motion for an 16 emergency temporary restraining order (“TRO”) (Doc. 2), an application for leave to 17 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (Doc. 3), and a motion to allow electronic filing (Doc. 18 4). 19 The latter two requests are granted—Plaintiff has adequately established that she 20 should be allowed to proceed IFP…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.