Legal Opinion

DeAngelis v. Bartoletti

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 27, 2025No. 2:25-cv-02753Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Heather Rae DeAngelis, No. CV-25-02753-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Anthony Bartoletti, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On August 4, 2025, pro se Plaintiff filed a complaint (Doc. 1), a motion for an 16 emergency temporary restraining order (“TRO”) (Doc. 2), an application for leave to 17 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (Doc. 3), and a motion to allow electronic filing (Doc. 18 4). 19 The latter two requests are granted—Plaintiff has adequately established that she 20 should be allowed to proceed IFP…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API