Legal Opinion

Jacoby v. Bethlehem Suburban Motor Sales

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 2011No. Civil Action No. 09-5661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Warren Jacoby (“Plaintiff’) filed a four count complaint against Bethlehem Suburban Motor Sales d/b/a Bethlehem Ford (“Defendant”) alleging age and disability discrimination pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”).' (Compl. ¶ 30-57.) Discovery is now complete, and Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment as to all of Plaintiffs claims. (Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. at 4.) Based on the following…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Philadelphia Gas WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. LEE v. BAY, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. RUTKO v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Wojtowicz v. Gichner Shelter SystemsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API