Legal Opinion
Coleman (Parent) Holdings v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 7, 2009No. 4D08-4022PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc. (CPH) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to set aside judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). The judgment that CPH sought to set aside was entered in favor of Morgan Stanley, pursuant to our mandate in Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. v. Coleman (Parent) Holdings, Inc., 955 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). In that appeal, we reversed compensatory and punitive damage awards for CPH because CPH had failed to present legally sufficient proof of damages at trial. In its Rule 1.540(b) motion, CPH sought a new trial based upon its claim…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- DeClaire v. YohananSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Sheldon Drobny and Anita Drobny v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Flemenbaum v. FlemenbaumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Coleman HoldingsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Freemon v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Cottrell v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. PaizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- THELMA ROWE-LEWIS v. HORACE LEWISDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.