Legal Opinion

Hall v. Palmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Lapeer. (Stickney, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff was drain commissioner of the township of Imlay, in Lapeer county. The defendants are residents of Imlay. Some time in May, 1882, the defendants applied in writing to the plaintiff as drain commissioner, to construct a water-course or open ditch in the township of Imlay, as follows:

“ Commencing at the crossing of Belle river by the Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway; thence southeasterly along the course of said Belle river to the crossing of said river by the Boss road bridge, on section 33.”

On receiving this application the plaintiff proceeded to examine personally the line of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kornicks v. Lindy's SupermarketMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Case v. TellingMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Jones v. ChennaultMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API