Legal Opinion

Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Chicago Great Western R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1951No. 14395_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order denying in its entirety appellants’ motion for a temporary injunction enjoining appellee, pending determination of this action on its merits, from taking any further action in furtherance of the abandonment, destruction or dismantling of the so-called Terminal Bridge in its line of railroad be tween South St. Paul, Minnesota, and. its Hoffman Avenue Yard, in St. Paul, Minnesota, or the abandonment or destruction of any other portion of its said line of railroad. The parties will be referred to as they were designated in the trial court.

This was a suit in equity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayo v. Lakeland Highlands Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Benson Hotel Corporation v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  4. Pratt v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  5. Cone v. RorickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Ralph Nader, Esquire, and Center for Auto Safety, Inc. v. John Volpe, Individually, and as Secretary of the Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Central Presbyterian Church v. Black Liberation FrontDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1969
  5. Lerner v. LernerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API