Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 2025No. 4:24-cv-00458Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARY B. B., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-00458-SH ) FRANK BISIGNANO,1 ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff Mary B. B. seeks judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381–1383f. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to proceed before a United States…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Grogan v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API