Legal Opinion

Rittenberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 26, 2003No. A02A2395PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

In November 1999, Wesley Rittenberry, then represented by counsel, pled guilty to selling cocaine. Nineteen months later, he filed a pro se motion for out-of-time appeal claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, which the trial court summarily denied. On appeal, Rittenberry contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing and making specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. This contention is without merit, and we affirm.

An out-of-time appeal is appropriate when a direct appeal was not taken due to ineffective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Grantham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Thorpe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API