Legal Opinion

Mechensky v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Virginia Mechensky and McGraw-Edison Company (McGraw) appeal two orders of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (Commission) which found that McGraw violated an agreement entered into with Ms. Mechensky when McGraw released information to a third party concerning the termination of Ms. Mechensky’s employment with McGraw. The Commission awarded Ms. Mechensky nominal damages for this breach. Both parties have appealed the orders, and their appeals have been consolidated by this Court. The Commission orders are affirmed.

I

Ms. Mechensky filed a sex discrimination charge against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. ROCHEZ BROTHERS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Charles R. RHOADES, Appellant, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Warner CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Williamsburg Community School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson and Coker, Inc. v. LynamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. MacK v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Blue Comet Diner v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Smithgall v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Blue Comet Diner v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API