Legal Opinion

American Art Works v. Chicago Picture Frame Works

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Perry L. Persons, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

The American Art Works sued the Chicago Picture Frame Works in the municipal court of Chicago and recovered a judgment, which the Appellate Court affirmed. By a writ of certiorari the record has been brought up for review.

The defendant in error is a corporation of the State of New Jersey, having its factory and principal office in Coshocton, Ohio, and has not obtained a license to do business in this State. The. only question argued is the authority of the defendant in error to maintain the suit. The question was raised by a motion for an instruction directing the jury to find, the issues for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alpena Portland Cement Co. v. Jenkins & Reynolds Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Radio Shack Corporation v. Radio Shack, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  3. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. National Casket Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Marshall Milling Co. v. RosenbluthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
  5. Higgin Manufacturing Co. v. Foreman Bros. Banking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API