Legal Opinion

Baatz v. Arrow Bar

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1988No. 15875Published

1Opinion of the Court

426 N.W.2d 298 (1988)

Kenny BAATZ and Peggy Baatz, Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

ARROW BAR a/k/a Arrow Bar, Inc., Edmond E. Neuroth, LaVella J. Neuroth, and Jacquette J. Neuroth, Defendants and Appellees.

No. 15875.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Considered on Briefs February 16, 1988.

Decided June 15, 1988.

Rehearing Denied July 19, 1988.

Flynn Fischer, Wessington Springs, for plaintiffs and appellants.

David Alan Palmer of Strange & Palmer, P.C., Sioux Falls, for defendants and appellees.

SABERS, Justice.

Facts

Kenny Baatz claims he and his wife, Peggy, were seriously injured when a vehicle operated by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API