Columbia Casualty Co. v. Rogers Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. Where a policy of burglary insurance provides indemnity to the insured “ for all loss of money, . . occasioned by the felonious abstraction of the same from within the safe or safes described in* the schedule, . . after entry into such safe or safes has been effected by force and violence by the use of tools, explosives, electricity, or chemicals directly thereupon, of which force and violence there shall be visible marks, . . and for all loss by damages (except by fire) to the said money, . . caused directly by such entry into the safe, or attempt thereat,” and provides that the insurer “…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- National Surety Co. v. ChalkleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Jackson Steam Laundry v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Remedial Finance Corp. v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of N. A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Johnston v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.