Legal Opinion
Rozek v. New York Blood Center
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 21, 2013No. 10-CV-3147 (ADS)(WDW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The Plaintiff Susan Rozek (“the Plaintiff’) brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against the Defendants New York Blood Center (“NYBC”), NYBC in its capacity as Plan Administrator of NYBC, and First Unum Life Insurance Company (“First Unum,” and collectively, “the Defendants”). She alleges that she was wrongfully denied long-term disability benefits by First Unum under the terms of the NYBC Plan (“the Plan”), which was an employee welfare benefits plan funded by the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Wedge v. Shawmut Design & Construction Group Long Term Disability Insurance PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Archer v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Davis v. Flexible Benefits System, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Khesin v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.