Legal Opinion · Dissent

Watson v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 30, 1931No. 31,120Published

1DissentO’Niell, C. J.

The judge ordered the appellant in this case to give an appeal bond “according to law,” meaning according to the provisions of article 576 of the Code of Practice, which provides: “If the judgment decree the delivery of some movable of a perishable nature, the court shall require security to an amount exceeding by one-half the estimated value of such movable.”

The next article (577) of the Code of Practice leaves no doubt that any movable property may be regarded as “of a perishable nature,” within the meaning of article 576, because article 577 declares: “But if the judgment decree the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schwan v. SchwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  2. Successions of KellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  3. Day v. BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Pelletier v. State Nat. BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  5. Knoll v. KnollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API