Legal Opinion
Pfohl v. AMAX, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court should have granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 214-c [2]). The record establishes that, more than three years before the commencement of the suit, plaintiffs requested reductions in their real property tax assessments on the ground that the values of their properties were reduced by their proximity to a "hazardous waste dump” or "Pfohl’s Landfill”. In addition, the Department of Environmental…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Jensen v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Johnson v. MarianettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scheg v. Agway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In Re Pfohl Bros. Landfill LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999