Legal Opinion
Murnick v. Asbury Park City
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided February 3, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREW, J.T.C.
In this motion for judgment pursuant to the Freeze Act, N.J.S.A. 54:2-43, plaintiffs present an issue that has not been previously subjected to judicial scrutiny. The question is whether plaintiffs can obtain freeze judgments for tax years 1978 and 1979 based on a final judgment for 1977 after it has litigated the tax years of 1977, 1978 and 1979 in a consolidated proceeding.
This local property tax matter originally involved the issues of the proper valuation of a 15-story apartment building and *408whether inequality in assessment existed in the taxing district. This matter has had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- City of Newark v. FischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clearview Gardens Associates v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Fulginiti v. Cape May County Sheriff's Dept.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- United Jersey Bank v. Director, Div. of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1992
- Wilshire Selby West, Ltd. v. Ramsey BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.