Legal Opinion
Dopico v. Goldschmidt
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 24, 1981No. 80 Civ. 4562, 80 Civ. 4862PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
These are consolidated class actions in which plaintiffs, individually and representing all wheelchair-bound handicapped individuals, seek declaratory and injunctive relief to compel the defendants to comply with various statutes and regulations enacted by the Congress to implement the policy that the handicapped have the same right as other persons to use mass transportation facilities and services.
The defendants fall into two categories, federal and local. The defendants Goldschmidt, Lutz and Walker, officials of the United States Department of…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rhea Dopico v. Neil E. Goldschmidt, Disabled in Action v. Neil E. GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Dugar v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Nelson v. ThornburghDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Jensen v. ConradDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL U. NO. 3, ETC. v. BohnDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.