Legal Opinion

Routen v. Van Duyse

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 1966No. 5-3896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Osro Cobb, Justice.

This is a controversy between adjacent rural landowners in Pulaski County. Appellee recovered judgment in the Circuit Court, a jury having been waived, for damages in the sum of $225 resulting from a fire which originated on appellant’s lands and. spread to the lands of appellee.

After the filing here of appellant’s abstract and brief, appellee filed motion for affirmance of the judgment of the trial court under the provisions of Ark. Supreme Court Eule 9(d), alleging insufficiency of appellant’s abstract. We quote the pertinent provisions of said Eule as follows:

“Abstract.—T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellington v. RemmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Allen v. OverturfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Tenbrook v. Daisy Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boren v. QuallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. First Nat. Bank of Brinkley v. FreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Tucker v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Tudor v. TudorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Big Rock, Inc. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API