Legal Opinion

Tenbrook v. Daisy Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 1964No. 5-3299PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case, wherein appellant contended that she was accidentally injured in the course of her employment, and thus entitled to compensation benefits. The Heferee made a finding in her behalf, but this decision was reversed by the full Commission, and on appeal the Circuit Court of Washington County upheld the findings of the Commission, and entered its judgment accordingly.

This case must be affirmed under Rule 9 (d). In Vire v. Vire, 236 Ark. 740, 368 S. W. 2d 265, we said:

“* * * We have stated numerous times that we are not required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vire v. VireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Allen v. OverturfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Reeves v. MilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boren v. QuallsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. First Nat. Bank of Brinkley v. FreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Goodloe v. GoodloeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Routen v. Van DuyseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Energy Oil Co. v. Rose Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API