Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Taos Municipal-County Zoning Authority

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1991No. 12462PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

Respondents, the Taos Municipal-County Zoning Authority (the TMZA) and Sam Lucero appeal from a district court judgment reversing a decision of the TMZA which had approved a zoning amendment application made by Lucero for a mobile home planned unit development (the PUD). They raise three issues: (1) whether petitioners had standing to challenge the decision of the TMZA; (2) whether the district court erred in determining that Lucero’s plan did not include a “community park” water and/or sewer system and did not otherwise conform to the relevant requirements; and (3)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Downtown Neighborhoods Ass'n v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Klumker v. Van AllredNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States v. Plains Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Huning Castle Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Andalucia Development Corp. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Hyde v. TAOS MUNICIPAL-COUNTY ZON. AUTH.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API