Legal Opinion

Williams v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 22, 1986No. 85, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUCH, Judge.

The question presented herein involves whether a trial court could set aside a separation agreement between the parties to this case on the ground that the agreement was so oppressive on the husband that it shocked the conscience of the court.

I

Petitioner, Charles Robert Williams (“Husband” or “Mr. Williams”), and respondent, Kathleen L. Williams (“Wife” or “Mrs. Williams”), were married on September 30, 1967, and lived together as husband and wife for approximately fifteen years. Three children were born as a result of the marriage.

At the time of their separation on May 4, 1982,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Spector v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Cronin v. HebditchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  4. Bell v. BellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Grossman v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stone v. Stone (In Re Stone)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1987
  2. Cannon v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Faulkner v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Martin v. FarberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Shih Ping Li v. Tzu LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API