State v. French
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt
Mark French, the defendant, was convicted of three counts of sexual intercourse without consent by jury trial in the District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County. Defendant appealed. We affirm.
The issues raised on appeal are:
1. Did the District Court err in denying defendant’s motion for a mistrial?
2. Did sufficient evidence of penetration exist to sustain defendant’s conviction of sexual intercourse without consent?
3. Did the District Court err in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance of the trial?
On July 7, 1987, Mark French, the defendant, was convicted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- State v. GeymanMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BrodniakMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CloseMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. OmanMontana Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- State v. RiggsMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. J.C.E.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. St. GermainMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Montana v. HaskinsMontana Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.