Legal Opinion

In Re Naturalization of Yuen Lan Hom

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 6, 1968No. Petition 2270-781016PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKEL, District Judge.

In this naturalization proceeding, the Immigration and Naturalization Service states regretfully that it finds itself compelled by statute to take a position which is on its face harsh, arbitrary, and capriciously discriminatory, and has been described by a special inquiry officer of the Service as “absurd.” 1 Fortunately, in this court’s view, the Congress neither commanded nor authorized this painful course.

I

The facts are undisputed. Born 34 years ago in China, the petitioner was married in 1956 to Poy Fong Horn. Alleging that her husband was an American…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ErricoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McMeekin v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reid v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Enriqueta Reginalda Gonzalez De Moreno v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Yik Shuen Eng v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. Ernest Werner Loos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  5. LIMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API