Legal Opinion

Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance v. Holeman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1996No. 95-425PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

The United States District Court for the District of Montana, Billings Division, has certified the following question to this Court pursuant to Rule 44, M.R.App.P. We answer the certified question “no.”

The certified question is:

Section 33-23-203, MCA, prohibits the stacking of the uninsured motorist coverage available under a policy of motor vehicle liability insurance. Does Section 33-23-203, MCA, prohibit the stacking of the medical payment coverage and the underinsured motorist coverage available under a policy of motor vehicle liability insur*276anee where a premium is charged for coverage of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Clarke v. MasseyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sayers v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Chilberg v. RoseMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Tongue River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Montana Power Co. v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance v. HolemanMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Infinity Insurance v. DodsonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Dempsey v. Allstate Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dakota Fire Insurance v. OieMontana Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API