Legal Opinion

Bates-Smith Investment Co. v. Scott

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1898No. 8352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Key,sort, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Harrison, O. J.

This action was commenced by defendant in error before a justice of the peace of Douglas county to recover of the plaintiff in error and Charles E. Bates the sum of $50, asserted to be his due from them by reason of services by him rendered to them under and by virtue of a contract. In the justice’s court the defendant in error was accorded a judgment against the company as follows:

“It is therefore considered by me that the said plaintiff recover from the defendant Bates-Smith Investment Company the sum of ($30) thirty dollars and costs of this suit herein expended, taxed at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ricketson v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Bensieck v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. State ex rel. Ozark County v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Consaul v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Curtin v. AtkinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shreeder v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Kansas City Life Insurance v. NeverveNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Olsen v. MarquisNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API