Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 2021No. 18 CO 0033PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Martin,

2021-Ohio-4290.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLUMBIANA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM E. MARTIN, II, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY Case No.

18 CO 0033

Motion to Reopen BEFORE: Gene Donofrio, Cheryl L. Waite, Carol Ann Robb, Judges. JUDGMENT: Denied Atty. Robert Herron, Prosecutor, Atty. Ryan Weikart, Assistant Prosecutor, Columbiana County Prosecutor’s Office, 105 South Market Street, Lisbon, Ohio 44432, for Plaintiff-Appellee and Atty. Rhys Cartwright-Jones, 42 North Phelps Street, Youngstown, Ohio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GummOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. TuckerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. TuckerOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Furman v. MackeyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
  3. Martin v. Warden, Belmont Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Martin v. Warden, Belmont Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  5. State v. EasterlyOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API