Home Brewing Co. v. Mahler
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion to dismiss bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Backes, V. C.
This motion is to strike out the bill for want of equity.
The complaint contains allegations that are impertinent and prayers that are vain, which tend to confuse, but stripped of extraneous matter, the bill is for a discovery and an accounting of the assets of a decedent’s estate, which the executrix is called upon to make.
The pertinent facts and the admissible prayers are these: Reuben Mahler, at the time of his death, was indebted to the complainant in the sum of $15,343.81. Bjr his will, admitted to probate by the surrogate of Middlesex county November 14th, 1918, he gave his…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bowes v. United StatesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Phila. Home, C. v. Phila. Saving Fund SocietyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Philadelphia Saving Fund Society v. DisstonPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1937
- Robertson v. BiernackaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- In Re RubinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1936