State ex rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Adams Express Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey 'County, Egan, J., denying a motion to quash an alternative writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was a proceeding, by an alternative writ of mandamus, to compel the Adams Express Company, doing business as a common carrier in this state, to print, and keep for public inspection, .schedules showing the classification, rates, fares, and charges for the transportation of property of all kinds and classes in force and charged by it in this state, and to file a copy of such schedules with the railroad and warehouse commission. The writ was issued on the relation of the commission, relying on the provisions of Laws 1895, c. 152, and the several laws therein referred to; and, when allowed…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hibbs v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Bloom v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Adams Express Co. v. SchofieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Drainage District No. 7 v. BernardsOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Hamilton v. Delaware Motor Trades, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.