Legal Opinion

Cornwell v. Kootenai County Sheriff

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1984No. 14638PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Judge Pro Tem.

This is an appeal from the Industrial Commission’s denial of claimant’s request for unemployment compensation. The commission found that claimant was discharged for misconduct and that claimant was therefore not entitled to receive benefits. We affirm.

The applicable provision of the Employment Security Law is I.C. § 72-1366(e), which states in pertinent part:

“The personal eligibility conditions of a benefit claimant are that—

$ * sjs $ $ $

“(e) His unemployment is not due to the fact that he left his employment voluntarily without good cause, or that he was discharged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johns v. SH Kress & CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Parker v. St. Maries PlywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Matthews v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Claim of Watts v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Jenkins v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kyle v. Beco Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Spruell v. Allied Meadows Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Puckett v. Idaho Department of CorrectionsIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Olvera v. Del's Auto BodyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Jensen v. SiemsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API