Legal Opinion

Sanford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1988No. 54758Published

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent terms of twenty-five years and ten years respectively. That conviction was affirmed in State v. Sanford, 734 S.W.2d 525 (Mo.App.1987).

A brief recitation of the facts of the original trial may be helpful in the resolution of the issues presently before us:

The victim of the robbery, a service station attendant, identified movant as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. SanfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Glover v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Todd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API