Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 21, 1992No. 05-91-00685-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KINKEADE, Justice.

Roger Earl Fisher appeals his convictions for illegal investment and delivery of a controlled substance. After Fisher changed his plea from not guilty to nolo contendere, the trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ confinement in the state penitentiary and a fine of $50,000 for the illegal investment offense. After a bench trial where Fisher pleaded not guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ confinement in the state penitentiary and a fine of $1000 for the delivery of the controlled substance offense. In five points of error, Fisher argues…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Marras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  2. Bachick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Leo Watson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  4. Barry McBride Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  5. Elizabeth Ann Black v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API