Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Comly
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Blu,me, Justice.
This case involves the question as to whether or not gypsite is, or rather, in 1927 was, subject to a produc tion tax under the constitutional and statutory provisions hereinafter mentioned. The court held that it was not, and the county assessor of Albany County and the State Board of Equalization have appealed. Section 3, Article 15, of the state Constitution, provides as follows:
“All mines and mining claims from which gold, silver and other precious metals, soda, saline, coal, mineral oil and other valuable deposit, is or may be produced shall be taxed in addition to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bunten v. Rock Springs Grazing Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. MjeldeMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Hendler v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. County of MusselshellMontana Supreme Court · 1917
- Nephi Plaster & Mfg. Co. v. Juab CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Hillard v. Big Horn Coal CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. State Board of Equalization v. Monolith Portland Midwest Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Groves v. Terrace Mining CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- State Tax Commission v. Wallapai Brick & Clay Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.