Gasper v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiteord
The defendant was charged with owning, possessing, and operating a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and he comes here on error to review the judgment on a verdict -against him, and moves for a supersedeas.
The only, assignment of error urged upon the application for a supersedeas is the action of the district court, denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, which was based upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.
It is clear, from an examination of the transcript, that the matters presented in the motion and affidavit for a new trial did not constitute newly discovered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eachus v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Sebold v. RiegerColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Digiallonardo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- People in Interest of PNSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Small v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Hudspeth v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- McPhee v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.