Legal Opinion

People in Interest of PN

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 9, 1983No. 83SA106PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEIGHBORS, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in which the petitioner seeks to prohibit the respondent district judge from holding a new trial on the petitioner’s motion to terminate the parent-child relationship between the children, P.N. and S.N., and their father, K.N. The trial court granted K.N.’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The petitioner then filed this case pursuant to C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause. We reverse the order of the trial court and make the rule absolute.

I

A petition in dependency or neglect was filed by the People in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. HoltzmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of C.A.K., A Child, and Concerning K.D.K.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Mergele v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Sharp County v. Northeast Arkansas Planning & Consulting Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alzado v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. People v. District Court of the 2nd Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Aspen Skiing Co. v. PeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. DistelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Messler v. PhillipsColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API