Ex Parte Morgan
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted certiorari review in order to determine whether the certain evidence seized following a warrantless arrest was admissible.
The defendant, Joseph Morgan, was found guilty of kidnapping in the first degree, possession of obscene material, two counts of enticement, and indecent exposure. At trial, Morgan argued that his arrest was improper and that evidence found following that arrest was inadmissible because of the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction, holding that the defendant's arrest was proper and that evidence found…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Manuel Nicholas DiazCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.