Legal Opinion

Dianne Knox v. California State Employees Association

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2010No. 08-16645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Dissent by Judge WALLACE.

OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question of whether a union is required, pursuant to Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292, 106 S.Ct. 1066, 89 L.Ed.2d 232 (1986), in addition to an annual fee notice to nonmembers, to send a second notice when adopting a temporary, mid-term fee increase. Under the circumstances presented by this case, we conclude that a second notice is not required, and we reverse the judgment of the district court.

I

A

Congress has long recognized the “important contribution of the union shop to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greco v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  2. Knox v. CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Raines v. Front Porch Communities and ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API