Legal Opinion
Maxus Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 29, 1994No. 93-5005PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGE R, Circuit Judge.
This is a tax case. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determined that deductions, taken in 1984 and 1985 by a manufacturer of the Agent Orange chemical defoliant based on a settlement of claims brought by Vietnam veterans for injuries allegedly arising from exposure to Agent Orange, were improper. Maxus Energy Corporation (Maxus) and subsidiaries sought relief in the Court of Federal Claims.1 That court, after granting-partial summary judgment, then dismissed pursuant to a joint stipulation of the parties the complaint seeking a refund of taxes paid in the 1974 and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Burke H. Mendenhall and Plaza-Hill Realty Corporation v. Steven GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Rivera v. PNS Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Kraft, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- John Terry Malone v. Potomac Highlands Airport AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.