Legal Opinion
State v. SIMINAUSKY
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 6, 2009No. AC 28965PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The defendant, Andrew J. Siminausky, appeals from the judgments of conviction rendered following the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. On appeal, the defendant claims that he did not enter knowing, intelligent and voluntary guilty pleas because his decision to plead guilty pursuant to a plea agreement was influenced by promises made by his attorneys outside of that agreement. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of the defendant’s appeal. On November 29, 2006, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. SuttonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. OcasioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. SIMINAUSKYSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009