Legal Opinion
State v. Reynolds
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 1, 2011No. AC 30776PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant, Donesque Charles Rey-
nolds, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a plea of guilty to the part B information, of being a persistent serious felony offender subject to enhanced penalties under General Statutes § 53a-40 (c). The underlying conviction, 1 rendered after a jury trial and subject to the enhanced penalties includes conspiracy to commit identity theft in the third degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-129d, 2 and conspiracy to commit larceny in the third degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-124…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. KokkinakosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.