Legal Opinion
Diehl v. Pennsylvania Parole Board
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 11, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00019Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLES T. DIEHL, No. 4:25-CV-00019 Petitioner, (Chief Judge Brann) v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AUGUST 11, 2025 Petitioner Charles T. Diehl initiated this action by filing a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenges several denials of parole, claiming that the decisions by the Pennsylvania Parole Board violated his procedural and substantive due process rights. Because Diehl has not established a constitutional violation, the Court will deny his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Joseph Coady v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Montgomery the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Erasmo Gambino v. E.W. Morris (Warden-Fci Fairton) United States Parole CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Newman v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.