State v. Delaney
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. Wayne Delaney appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He raises an argument that we are seeing with increasing frequency of late: that a 1994 letter from then Wisconsin Governor Tommy G. Thompson to the Department of Corrections (DOC) regarding the mandatory release of violent offenders negatively affected his parole eligibility and therefore constitutes a new factor requiring resentencing. We agree with the trial court that Delaney did not clearly and convincingly establish that the Thompson letter constitutes a new factor. We affirm the order.
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BorrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MichelsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- State v. CrochiereWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Britt v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HarborWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007