Moultrie v. . Hunt
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
One of the requisites to a valid will of real or personal property, according to the Revised Statutes, is, that the testator should, at the time of subscribing it, or at the time of acknowledging it, declare, in the presence of at least two attesting witnesses, that it is his last will and testament. (2 R.S., p. 63, § 40.) The will which the Surrogate of New York admitted to probate, by the order under review, was defectively executed in this particular — the only statement which the alleged testator made to the witnesses being that it was his signature and seal which was affixed to it. It…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parsons v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Betts v. Jackson ex dem. BrownCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- De Peyster v. ClendiningNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Desesbats v. BerquierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1808
- In re Roberts' Will & CodicilNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Chamberlain v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- St. John v. Andrews Institute for GirlsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- In Re Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.