Legal Opinion

Songster v. Beard

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-5916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Savage, United States District Judge

Kempis Songster, like all other juveniles in Pennsylvania who were sentenced to life without parole after having been convicted of murder, has never been afforded a constitutionally required individualized sentencing hearing. Now, as mandated by Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) and Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. _, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), he must be resentenced, taking into consideration the factors peculiar to his youthful status at the time of the offense and original sentencing.

Gra…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. LigonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. State v. McCleeseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  4. Burris v. CassadyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  5. Com. v. Bey, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API