Moore v. Lafayette Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating tbe case: Tbe evidence offered by tbe plaintiff was sufficient to carry tbe case to tbe jury. It is true, tbe evidence is conflicting as to whether tbe premiums were or were not in arrears more than four weeks at tbe time of tbe. assured’s death, but this did not warrant tbe withdrawal of tbe case from tbe jury. Myers v. Kirk, 192 N. C., 700; Smith v. Coach Line, 191 N. C., 589; Shell v. Roseman, 155 N. C., 90. If the plaintiff be entitled to recover under any view of tbe evidence, tbe motion for judgment as of nonsuit should be overruled. It is when — and only when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Shell v. . RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Smith v. Safety Coach Line, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Myers v. . KirkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926