Legal Opinion
United States of America, and Kalispel Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Pend Oreille County Public Utility District No. 1, and Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Defendant-Intervenor. United States of America, and Kalispel Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Pend Oreille County Public Utility District No. 1, and Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Defendant-Intervenor. United States of America, and Kalispel Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Pend Oreille County, and Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Defendant-Intervenor v. Kalispel Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1998No. 96-35022Published
1Opinion of the Court
135 F.3d 602
28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,555, 98 Cal. Daily Op.
Serv. 710,
98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 993
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
and
Kalispel Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor- Appellant,
v.
PEND OREILLE COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Washington State Department of Natural Resources,
Defendant-Intervenor.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Kalispel Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
PEND OREILLE COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Washington State Department of Natural Resources,
Defendant-Intervenor.
UNITED STATES of America,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.