Legal Opinion

Pastan v. Pastan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

The will of William Pastan was admitted to probate in Norfolk County on May 21, 1973, and in December of that year the plaintiff executors filed a Federal estate tax return claiming a marital deduction 3 of $82,193; giving effect to the deduction, they paid an estate tax of $1,683. The Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.), basing itself on a certain interpretation of the provisions of the will regarding the executors’ powers in funding the marital deduction trust — an interpretation disputed by the executors — disallowed $73,874 of the claimed deduction, 4 and assessed an additional tax which,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Fitts v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Mazzola v. MyersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Old Colony Trust Co. v. SillimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Van Schaack v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. First National Bank v. Judge Baker Guidance CenterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  4. Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Simches v. SimchesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API