Legal Opinion

Norden v. Duke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Brodie L. Duke, from a judgment of the Supreme .Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office- of the "clerk of .the county of New York on the 26th day of October, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order enterted in said clerk’s office on the 31st day of October, 1906, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:. The plaintiffs - were copartners, conducting business as stockbrokers in the city of New York under the firm name of “A. Norden & Company,” and the defendant was a resident of "the city of Durham, N. C. The action is brought to recover an alleged balance of account claimed to be owing to the plaintiffs by the defendant, as the result of certain .stock transactions which .they claim to have conducted for him. The defendant' had' an office in Durham, and employed one William G. Bramham, who acted as his private secretary, stenographer, bookkeeper and. clerk. The principal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Merritt v. . BissellNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Hopkins v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Norden v. DukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Hogue v. SimonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lord v. United States Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Norden v. DukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Ramsay v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API