Legal Opinion

Cumana Investments S.A. v. Fluor Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 31, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-37-JLLPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

This is an action by Cumana Investments S.A. (“Cumana”) for recovery on the claims of two Iranian nationals against an international joint venture. Cumana seeks damages for breach of an alleged contract or, alternatively, recovery to prevent the defendant’s unjust enrichment. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 1.) Cumana further asks the Court to require the defendant, Fluor Corporation (“Fluor”), to make future payments which may come due under the supposed contract. (Id.) The case is before the Court on Fluor’s motion for summary judgment. 1 After reviewing the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Smyth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Chirinos de Alvarez v. Creole Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ahearn v. Anderson-Bishop PartnershipWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API